Skip to main content

Thinking activity: Derrida and Deconstruction

Derrida and Deconstruction :-
 




French philosopher Jacques Derrida, collecting some of the early lectures and essays that established his international fame. It was published in 1967 alongside Of Grammatology and Speech and Phenomena.


The question of why Derrida’s texts are so difficult is interesting in itself. One reason is the unfamiliarity of his concepts. Another is his concern that statements asserting knowledge always assume other knowledge. As Hilary Lawson says in his excellent 1985 book Reflexivity: The Post-Modern Predicament, “our ‘certainties’ are expressed through texts, through language, through sign systems, which are no longer seen to be neutral. It appears, therefore, in principle there can be no arena of certainty.” Derrida wants to avoid making statements which depend either on fixed linguistic meanings or on assumptions made elsewhere.





Take the word ‘justice’. The word signifies an abstract concept. Our concept of justice is moreover associated with the concrete institutions of justice – the courts, the police. The complainant wants justice (in the abstract), and looks to the courts for it, and considers the abstract concept and what the courts deal in as the same. But are they? Meaning evolves all the time, and the concept of justice changes: it would have had a different meaning in the minds of most people before there were any courts. On the other hand, one concept of justice – these days the institutional concept – is likely to dominate.


This flexibility also means that texts are capable of more than one interpretation. Peter Benson gave a good example of this in this very magazine: “the medieval Christian approach to the Bible declared there to be four ways to read each passage: literal, analogical, typological and topological. These interpretative traditions have been challenged by fundamentalists, who seek to pin an immediately-known fixed meaning to every word… Fundamentalism is therefore one manifestation of the metaphysics of presence. From Derrida’s perspective, it involves a misunderstanding of the nature of language”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mass communications and Media studies

Study: M. A. Sem. 4 Subject: 15 - Mass communications and Media studies Topic: Mass communications and Mass culture Department of English MKBU. Guide: Dr. Hinaba Zala Assignment by Prinjal Shiyal   Mass communications:     Mass communication become the part of our everyday life and in present time this is very popular in our Media culture.The alternative term mass culture conveys the idea that such culture emerges spontaneously from the masses themselves, like popular art did before the 20th century. The expression media culture, on the other hand, conveys the idea that such culture is the product of the mass media. In media studies, media psychology, communication theory, and sociology, media influence and media effects are topics relating to mass media and media culture's effects on individual or an audience's thoughts, attitudes, and behavior. Whether it is written, televised, or spoken, mass media reaches a large audience. Mass media is ...

Assignment: African literature

Study: M. A. Sem. 4 Subject: 14 - African Literature Topic: Meaning of Barbarians and Civilized and note on the conflict between Civilization and Barbarians? Department of English MKBU. Guide: Dr. Hinaba Zala Assignment, by Prinjal Shiyal ◆What is the meaning of the "Barbarians" and "Civilized"? Write note on the conflict between 'Civilization' and 'Barbarians'? https://m.box.com/shared_item/https%3A%2F%2Fapp.box.com%2Fs%2F9icqjpch4xh688onwfkd75f90xqshyx3   ● "Waiting for the Barbarians" novel by J. M. Coetzee and this novel published in 1980. This text demands the contextual study because there are many major historical events connected. Like, Civilization, Colonialism, Marginalization and so on. On various occasions civilized man has found himself marching side by side with men at lower levels of social and cultural development. The great civilizations were accustomed to compare themselves quite favorably with thes...

How Literature shaped me?

How Literature shaped me? we have three questions for literature:  1. What is literature? 2.Why we study literature? 3.How does it make any difference?     Literature is living thoughts, it is very helpful me for understand our culture, religion, thoughts, power, politics, every day life and so many things from the literature. It helpful for criticism, and rational thoughts and through it people will be mentally stronger. Text book has power to give you power of experience because, this is only things that I was learned from the literature. And all precious things we can learn from literature.    Literature it self as a lack of knowledge and it will always the part of everybody's life. It will give happiness and sorrow and for people Literature connected with conscious, subconscious and unconscious mind also.         Metaphor of Literature:  Seed of tree My Ot...